Which method of assessment is used to evaluate long-term impact of training on job performance?

Summative evaluation is the method used to assess the long-term impact of training on job performance. This evaluation typically occurs after the training has been completed and aims to determine if the training objectives have been achieved and how well the participants perform in their job roles as a result of that training. It often includes various types of assessments and measures, such as performance metrics, feedback from supervisors, and competency evaluations, that can clearly indicate how much the training has influenced job skills and effectiveness over time.

This method contrasts with formative evaluation, which is focused on the ongoing assessment and improvement of the training process while it is being delivered, rather than measuring post-training outcomes. Peer evaluation involves assessment from colleagues, which is more about providing insights into immediate performance rather than long-term impact. Ongoing assessment usually relates to continuous feedback and monitoring during the training process rather than a final evaluation of its effectiveness on job performance.